
## Note
This proposal should be discarded in favor of [this one](https://moonbeam.polkassembly.io/referendum/53)

Register a new local asset
No information is stored in this pallet about the local asset
The reason is that we dont need to hold a mapping between the multilocation
and the local asset, as this conversion is deterministic
Further, we dont allow xcm fee payment in local assets

- There is a proposal called polkassembly Referendum.
- It is suggested to discard this proposal and choose another one.
- The proposal can be found at a website called moonbeam.polkassembly.io.
- The proposal is about making a decision or voting on something.
- It is important to read the details of the proposal to understand it better.

#63 Please vote on referendum/53 instead